H12-323_V2.0 · Question #281
In the hotel wireless coverage scenario, which of the following descriptions of the guest room scenario network plan are correct? (Multiple choice)
The correct answer is A. When installing RU or panel AP in a room, it is usually installed under the table using 86 box or B. APs outside the room that cover the corridor should be installed away from the door of the guest C. If the guest rooms are separated by solid walls, APs can be deployed at equal intervals in the D. If the guest rooms are separated by solid walls, it is recommended to place one RU or panel AP. All four options describe standard best practices in hotel WLAN deployment, making this an "all of the above" scenario. A is correct because 86-box wall mounting (a standard 86mm junction box common in hospitality installations) keeps in-room RUs or panel APs flush…
Question
In the hotel wireless coverage scenario, which of the following descriptions of the guest room scenario network plan are correct? (Multiple choice)
Options
- AWhen installing RU or panel AP in a room, it is usually installed under the table using 86 box or
- BAPs outside the room that cover the corridor should be installed away from the door of the guest
- CIf the guest rooms are separated by solid walls, APs can be deployed at equal intervals in the
- DIf the guest rooms are separated by solid walls, it is recommended to place one RU or panel AP
How the community answered
(32 responses)- A100% (32)
Explanation
All four options describe standard best practices in hotel WLAN deployment, making this an "all of the above" scenario.
A is correct because 86-box wall mounting (a standard 86mm junction box common in hospitality installations) keeps in-room RUs or panel APs flush, tamper-resistant, and aesthetically integrated - typically near the desk or headboard for optimal user-device proximity.
B is correct because corridor APs positioned too close to guest room doors create uneven coverage "hot spots" near doorways while leaving mid-corridor areas underserved; offsetting them from doorways distributes signal more evenly along the hallway.
C is correct because solid concrete/brick walls provide natural signal containment, so corridor APs spaced at regular intervals can effectively serve the hallway zone without over-penetrating into rooms - a cost-efficient deployment.
D is correct because solid walls (high attenuation, typically 10–15 dB loss per wall) make corridor-only coverage unreliable inside rooms, so placing a dedicated in-room RU or panel AP per room guarantees the required signal strength and throughput.
Since all options are correct, there are no distractors to eliminate.
Memory tip: Think of the two scenarios as a fork - solid walls = dual strategy (corridor APs for hallways + in-room units for bedrooms), while corridor APs always avoid clustering near doors. The acronym RICE helps: RU in room, Interval spacing in corridor, Corridor AP offset from doors, Equal intervals when walls are solid.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.