Which of the following statements is wrong about using AP6310SN to independently build a WLAN room distribution system?

Question

Options

• AThe number of antennas with a single AP is 4~8. It is recommended that no more than 10
• BUnder normal circumstances, the distance between the AP and the farthest indoor antenna should
• CIn a typical indoor distribution scenario, it is recommended that the output power of each antenna
• DThere is interference between the indoor antennas of the same AP. Therefore, it cannot be

• A
  7% (1)
• B
  7% (1)
• D
  86% (12)

Explanation

Option D is the wrong statement because antennas connected to the same AP are all driven by the same radio source - they transmit the same signal and are not competing transmitters, so they do not create co-channel interference in the way that different APs on the same channel would. The AP manages all its antenna ports as a unified distributed system, which is exactly the design intent of a room distribution architecture.

Why the other options are correct (and therefore not the answer):

• A is a valid guideline - the AP6310SN supports 4–8 antenna ports and best practice caps the count around 10 to maintain acceptable signal strength at each port.
• B is a valid installation rule - cable runs to the farthest antenna are limited (typically ≤20–30 m) to prevent excessive signal attenuation over the coaxial feed.
• C is a valid power recommendation - per-antenna output is kept at a moderate level in dense indoor deployments to avoid over-coverage and inter-antenna spillover.

Memory tip: Think of same-AP antennas like speakers wired to one amplifier - they all play the same track, so there's no "interference" between them. Interference only arises when separate APs share a channel, not when one AP feeds multiple passive antenna endpoints.

No community discussion yet for this question.