H12-311_V3.0 · Question #197
Which of the following descriptions of power splitters and couplers is correct?
The correct answer is B. The power divider is equal power distribution, and the coupler is unequal power distribution. Option B is correct because a power divider (splitter) is specifically designed to split an input signal into two or more equal-power outputs - think of a 3 dB Wilkinson divider that splits power 50/50. A coupler (directional coupler), by contrast, takes a small, predefined…
Question
Which of the following descriptions of power splitters and couplers is correct?
Options
- APower dividers and couplers are equal power distribution
- BThe power divider is equal power distribution, and the coupler is unequal power distribution
- CThe power divider is unequal power distribution, and the coupler is equal power distribution
- DPower dividers and couplers are unequal power distribution
How the community answered
(28 responses)- A4% (1)
- B79% (22)
- C7% (2)
- D11% (3)
Explanation
Option B is correct because a power divider (splitter) is specifically designed to split an input signal into two or more equal-power outputs - think of a 3 dB Wilkinson divider that splits power 50/50. A coupler (directional coupler), by contrast, takes a small, predefined fraction of power from the main line (e.g., −10 dB, −20 dB), resulting in unequal outputs between the coupled port and the through port.
Why the distractors fail:
- A is wrong because it wrongly classifies couplers as equal-power devices - couplers are defined by their unequal coupling ratio.
- C reverses the definitions entirely - swapping what's true of dividers and couplers.
- D is wrong because it wrongly classifies dividers as unequal - equal splitting is the defining purpose of a power divider.
Memory tip: Think of the names literally - a "divider" divides evenly (equal shares, like splitting a bill), while a "coupler" couples a little bit of signal off the main path (unequal, like tapping a water pipe).
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.