H12-311_V3.0 · Question #102
The architecture of the wireless local area network is mainly divided into the thin AP architecture based on the controller and the traditional independent fat AP architecture.
The correct answer is A. True. Option A is correct because WLAN architecture is indeed primarily categorized into two models: the thin AP (lightweight AP) architecture, which relies on a centralized wireless controller (AC) to manage configuration and data forwarding, and the fat AP (autonomous AP)…
Question
The architecture of the wireless local area network is mainly divided into the thin AP architecture based on the controller and the traditional independent fat AP architecture.
Options
- ATrue
- BFalse
How the community answered
(52 responses)- A79% (41)
- B21% (11)
Explanation
Option A is correct because WLAN architecture is indeed primarily categorized into two models: the thin AP (lightweight AP) architecture, which relies on a centralized wireless controller (AC) to manage configuration and data forwarding, and the fat AP (autonomous AP) architecture, where each access point operates independently with its own full software stack. This two-model classification is a foundational concept in wireless networking standards and vendor implementations. Since the statement is entirely accurate, option B (False) is incorrect - there is no error or omission in the claim being made.
Memory tip: Think "fat = fully self-sufficient, thin = relies on a controller to function." Fat APs are independent; thin APs are lean because the controller carries the weight.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.