Which of the following evidences are the collection of facts that, when considered together, can be used to infer a conclusion about the malicious activity/person?

The correct answer is D. Circumstantial. Circumstantial evidences are the collection of facts that, when considered together, can be used to infer a conclusion about the malicious activity/person. Answer: B is incorrect. Corroborating evidence is evidence that tends to support a proposition that is already supported…

Audit Fundamentals & Planning

Question

Options

AIncontrovertible
BCorroborating
CDirect
DCircumstantial

How the community answered

(32 responses)

A
16% (5)
B
3% (1)
C
6% (2)
D
75% (24)

Explanation

Circumstantial evidences are the collection of facts that, when considered together, can be used to infer a conclusion about the malicious activity/person. Answer: B is incorrect. Corroborating evidence is evidence that tends to support a proposition that is already supported by some evidence. Answer: A is incorrect. Incontrovertible evidence is a colloquial term for evidence introduced to prove a fact that is supposed to be so conclusive that there can be no other truth as to the matter; evidence so strong, it overpowers contrary evidence, directing a fact- finder to a specific and certain conclusion. Answer: C is incorrect. Direct evidence is testimony proof for any evidence, which expressly or straight-forwardly proves the existence of a fact.

Topics

#evidence types#circumstantial evidence#forensics#audit evidence

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full GSNA Practice