Your organization wants to reduce costs. Which of the following actions should you take?

Question

Options

• AGrant all users admin permissions
• BRemove all outside collaborators
• CRegularly audit for inactive users
• DDisable SAML SSO for members

• A
  14% (5)
• B
  6% (2)
• C
  75% (27)
• D
  6% (2)

Explanation

Regularly auditing for inactive users (C) directly reduces costs because most platforms charge per seat or active user - removing accounts that no longer need access eliminates unnecessary licensing fees with no operational downside.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A - Granting admin permissions to all users increases security risk and has no bearing on cost reduction.
• B - Removing all outside collaborators may be disruptive and isn't inherently a cost-saving measure; the number of collaborators doesn't necessarily drive licensing costs the way internal seats do.
• D - Disabling SAML SSO would weaken security and centralized access control, which typically increases risk and management overhead, not savings.

Memory tip: Think "audit = prune dead weight." Inactive users are dormant seats you're still paying for - a regular audit is the only choice that directly targets waste without breaking security or collaboration.

No community discussion yet for this question.