Which of the following evidences are the collection of facts that, when considered together, can be used to infer a conclusion about the malicious activity/person?

Corroborating evidence supports or confirms other evidence already presented, rather than being itself a collection of facts used to infer a conclusion.

Circumstantial evidence consists of indirect facts or indicators that, when combined, lead to a reasonable inference about malicious activity or a suspect - it does not directly prove guilt but supports a logical conclusion through accumulation of related facts.

Incontrovertible evidence is evidence so conclusive it cannot be disputed or denied, which is the opposite of indirect inferential evidence.

Direct evidence directly proves a fact without requiring inference, such as an eyewitness account or a confession, and does not rely on combining multiple facts.