FC0-U61 · Question #446
A systems administrator downloads an update for a critical system. Before installing the update, the administrator runs a hash of the download and ensures the results match the published hash for the
The correct answer is C. integrity concerns.. Comparing the hash of a downloaded file to a published hash is a measure to ensure the integrity of the file, verifying that it has not been altered or corrupted during transit.
Question
A systems administrator downloads an update for a critical system. Before installing the update, the administrator runs a hash of the download and ensures the results match the published hash for the file. This is an example of:
Options
- Aconfidentiality concerns.
- Baccounting concerns.
- Cintegrity concerns.
- Davailability concerns.
How the community answered
(41 responses)- A5% (2)
- B2% (1)
- C90% (37)
- D2% (1)
Why each option
Comparing the hash of a downloaded file to a published hash is a measure to ensure the integrity of the file, verifying that it has not been altered or corrupted during transit.
Confidentiality concerns deal with protecting information from unauthorized access, not ensuring the accuracy or unalteration of a file.
Accounting (or accountability) concerns relate to tracking user actions and auditing, not verifying the state of a file after download.
Hashing a downloaded file and comparing its hash value to a publicly provided one verifies the integrity of the file. This process ensures that the file has not been tampered with, corrupted, or maliciously altered during download or storage, confirming that it is exactly the same as the original source file.
Availability concerns ensure that systems and data are accessible to authorized users when needed, which is not what hashing a file addresses.
Concept tested: Information security principles - Integrity
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/security/fundamentals/confidentiality-integrity-availability
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.