DU0-001 · Question #219
What is the most likely cause of unreliability in biometric technology?
The correct answer is D. Incorrect recognition (user recognized as the wrong person). Incorrect recognition (D) is the most likely cause of unreliability because biometric systems inherently produce probabilistic matches rather than exact ones - environmental factors like dirt, aging, injury, or angle variations can cause a legitimate user to be matched against…
Question
Options
- ASpoofing by an imposter
- BFailure of the scanning device
- CFailure to recognize a legitimate user
- DIncorrect recognition (user recognized as the wrong person)
How the community answered
(26 responses)- A4% (1)
- B8% (2)
- C15% (4)
- D73% (19)
Explanation
Incorrect recognition (D) is the most likely cause of unreliability because biometric systems inherently produce probabilistic matches rather than exact ones - environmental factors like dirt, aging, injury, or angle variations can cause a legitimate user to be matched against the wrong stored profile, producing a false match rather than a simple rejection. This is distinct from a system simply failing to recognize someone (C), which would deny access but at least fail safely; incorrect recognition is more insidious because the system thinks it succeeded.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- (A) Spoofing is a security threat, not a reliability issue - it's an attacker's deliberate action, not a system defect.
- (B) Device failure causes downtime, but modern scanners are generally reliable hardware; it's not the most likely source of ongoing unreliability.
- (C) Failure to recognize a legitimate user (false rejection) does occur, but it's the safer failure mode and less common than cross-matching errors in systems tuned to minimize false rejections.
Memory tip: Think of biometrics as "fuzzy" matching - the bigger risk isn't "I don't know you" (C) but "I think I know you" and getting it wrong (D). The word unreliability points to incorrect behavior, not just failure.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.