DEA-C01 · Question #110
An insurance company stores transaction data that the company compressed with gzip. The company needs to query the transaction data for occasional audits. Which solution will meet this requirement…
The correct answer is A. Store the data in Amazon Glacier Flexible Retrieval. Use Amazon S3 Glacier Select to query the. The company needs a cost-effective solution to store gzip-compressed transaction data and query it occasionally for audits.
Question
An insurance company stores transaction data that the company compressed with gzip. The company needs to query the transaction data for occasional audits. Which solution will meet this requirement in the MOST cost-effective way?
Options
- AStore the data in Amazon Glacier Flexible Retrieval. Use Amazon S3 Glacier Select to query the
- BStore the data in Amazon S3. Use Amazon S3 Select to query the data.
- CStore the data in Amazon S3. Use Amazon Athena to query the data.
- DStore the data in Amazon Glacier Instant Retrieval. Use Amazon Athena to query the data.
How the community answered
(56 responses)- A55% (31)
- B14% (8)
- C23% (13)
- D7% (4)
Why each option
The company needs a cost-effective solution to store gzip-compressed transaction data and query it occasionally for audits.
Amazon S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval offers the lowest storage cost for archival data that is accessed infrequently, aligning with 'occasional audits.' Amazon S3 Glacier Select allows running SQL queries directly on data stored in Glacier without needing to restore the entire object, significantly reducing the cost and time for occasional selective data retrieval.
Storing data directly in Amazon S3 Standard or S3 Intelligent-Tiering is more expensive than Glacier storage classes for infrequently accessed archival data, and while S3 Select works, the overall storage cost would be higher.
Using Amazon S3 for storage combined with Amazon Athena for querying would incur higher storage costs than Glacier for archival data. Athena queries also scan entire objects or partitions, which could be more expensive for selective queries compared to Glacier Select.
Amazon S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval has higher storage costs than Glacier Flexible Retrieval. Furthermore, Amazon Athena cannot directly query data stored in Glacier Instant Retrieval; data must be restored to S3 Standard first, adding complexity and cost.
Concept tested: Cost-effective archival storage and querying
Source: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazonglacier/latest/dev/glacier-select.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.