Which two statements regarding namespaces on ECS are true? (Select 2)

Question

Options

• AMultiple namespaces can share access to the same bucket.
• BNamespaces provide logical isolation of data.
• CNamespaces provide physical isolation of data.
• DMultiple namespaces require unique bucket names.

• A
  88% (29)
• C
  9% (3)
• D
  3% (1)

Explanation

A is correct because ECS allows cross-namespace bucket sharing - a single bucket can be made accessible to multiple namespaces, enabling resource sharing across tenants without duplicating storage. B is correct because namespaces in ECS are a logical construct: they act as tenant boundaries that segregate data, users, and policies within the same physical storage pool.

C is wrong because namespaces do not physically separate data onto different hardware - all namespaces coexist on the same underlying storage nodes and drives. D is wrong because namespace-level isolation actually allows different namespaces to reuse the same bucket name; it's the namespace + bucket combination that forms a unique identifier, not the bucket name alone.

Memory tip: Think of namespaces like folders on a shared hard drive - the drive (physical hardware) is shared, the folders (logical isolation) keep things organized, and two folders can even have files with the same name inside them.

No community discussion yet for this question.