Which two statements regarding ECS compliance are true? (Select 2)

Question

Options

• AApplies only to a namespace containing either CAS or S3 buckets
• BMust be enabled when creating a namespace
• CApplies only to a namespace containing both CAS and S3 buckets
• DCan be enabled on an existing bucket
• EMust be enabled when creating a bucket

• A
  71% (27)
• C
  5% (2)
• D
  8% (3)
• E
  16% (6)

Explanation

ECS compliance is a namespace-level feature that must be configured at the time the namespace is created - you cannot retroactively enable it, making B correct. It applies to any namespace that contains either CAS (Content Addressed Storage) or S3 buckets, not necessarily both, making A correct.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• C is wrong because it requires both CAS and S3 - the actual requirement is either/or.
• D is wrong because compliance is not a bucket-level setting at all; it operates at the namespace level.
• E is wrong for the same reason as D - compliance is enabled on the namespace, not on individual buckets.

Memory tip: Think of compliance as a "namespace birth certificate" - it must be declared at birth (namespace creation) and covers any child bucket type (CAS or S3) living in that namespace.

No community discussion yet for this question.