An Internet service provider wants to control the traffic for security and performance isolation. They want to separate the data and management traffic. Which two network separation topologies…

Question

Options

• ADual deployment with replication and data traffic on the default public network and the management
• BTriple deployment with management traffic on the public.mgmt network, replication traffic on the
• CDual deployment with replication and management traffic on the default public network and the data
• DTriple deployment with data and management traffic on the default public network and the replication

• A
  8% (3)
• B
  73% (29)
• D
  20% (8)

Explanation

Options B and C reflect Dell best practices for network separation because they each properly isolate traffic types to achieve both security and performance goals. Option C (dual deployment) separates high-bandwidth data traffic onto its own network, keeping replication and management together on the default public network - a valid two-tier split. Option B (triple deployment) goes further by giving management traffic its own dedicated public.mgmt network and isolating replication traffic separately, providing the strongest isolation for ISP environments with strict security requirements.

Option A is wrong because it places data traffic on the default public network alongside replication - Dell best practices prioritize isolating data traffic, not mixing it with replication on the shared network. Option D is wrong because a triple deployment that keeps both data and management on the same public network defeats the purpose of separation, since management traffic should be isolated to prevent it from being exposed to or affected by high-volume data traffic.

Memory tip: Think "separate what matters most" - Dell wants data isolated (high volume, performance-sensitive) and management isolated (security-sensitive). Any topology that lumps either of those with general public traffic is a wrong answer.

No community discussion yet for this question.