What disadvantage does EAP-TLS have when compared with PEAPv0 EAP/MSCHAPv2 as an 802.11 WLAN security solution?

Question

Options

• AFast/secure roaming in an 802.11 RSN is significantly longer when EAP-TLS is in use.
• BEAP-TLS does not protect the client's username and password inside an encrypted tunnel.
• CEAP-TLS cannot establish a secure tunnel for internal EAP authentication.
• DEAP-TLS is supported only by Cisco wireless infrastructure and client devices.
• EEAP-TLS requires extensive PKI use to create X.509 certificates for both the server and all clients,

• A
  5% (2)
• B
  3% (1)
• C
  3% (1)
• D
  8% (3)
• E
  82% (31)

No community discussion yet for this question.