nerdexam
CompTIA

CV0-003 · Question #109

Which of the following is a best practice used in relation to MTBF?

The correct answer is B. Proactively replace components before they fail. MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) is a reliability metric that predicts average component lifespan before failure, and the best practice is to use that prediction to proactively replace components before an unplanned outage occurs.

Operations and Support

Question

Which of the following is a best practice used in relation to MTBF?

Options

  • ADetermine backup schedule based on uptime requirements
  • BProactively replace components before they fail
  • CDetermine downtime to perform a system recovery
  • DReactively replace components after failure

How the community answered

(51 responses)
  • A
    2% (1)
  • B
    90% (46)
  • C
    2% (1)
  • D
    6% (3)

Why each option

MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) is a reliability metric that predicts average component lifespan before failure, and the best practice is to use that prediction to proactively replace components before an unplanned outage occurs.

ADetermine backup schedule based on uptime requirements

Backup schedules are driven by RPO (Recovery Point Objective), not by MTBF, which measures time between hardware failures rather than data recovery windows.

BProactively replace components before they failCorrect

MTBF data gives administrators a statistical prediction of component lifespan, enabling proactive replacement of components before they reach their expected failure point and cause unplanned outages. By scheduling replacements based on MTBF thresholds, organizations reduce unexpected downtime and maintain system availability. This is the core operational use of MTBF - converting failure prediction data into preventive maintenance actions.

CDetermine downtime to perform a system recovery

Determining downtime for system recovery relates to MTTR (Mean Time To Recovery), a separate metric that measures restoration time after failure, not the interval between failures.

DReactively replace components after failure

Reactively replacing components after failure ignores the predictive value of MTBF entirely and results in the avoidable unplanned downtime that MTBF analysis is designed to prevent.

Concept tested: MTBF-driven proactive component replacement strategy

Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/reliability/metrics

Topics

#MTBF#proactive maintenance#component replacement#availability

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full CV0-003 Practice