CV0-002 · Question #52
Which of the following generally has better performance when accessing larger databases?
The correct answer is B. SAN. When accessing larger databases, Storage Area Networks (SANs) generally offer superior performance compared to Network Attached Storage (NAS) due to their block-level access and dedicated, high-speed connectivity.
Question
Which of the following generally has better performance when accessing larger databases?
Options
- ANAS
- BSAN
- CCIFS
- DNFS
How the community answered
(23 responses)- B91% (21)
- C4% (1)
- D4% (1)
Why each option
When accessing larger databases, Storage Area Networks (SANs) generally offer superior performance compared to Network Attached Storage (NAS) due to their block-level access and dedicated, high-speed connectivity.
NAS (Network Attached Storage) provides file-level storage over standard Ethernet using protocols like NFS or CIFS, which introduces more overhead and generally results in lower performance compared to a SAN, making it less ideal for large, performance-sensitive databases.
SAN (Storage Area Network) provides block-level storage access directly to servers, often utilizing high-speed protocols like Fibre Channel or iSCSI, which offers superior performance, lower latency, and higher throughput essential for demanding database applications and large datasets. This direct block access allows the database server's operating system to manage the file system, optimizing I/O operations.
CIFS (Common Internet File System) is a file-sharing protocol used for network access to files, typically associated with NAS, and does not refer to the underlying storage architecture itself.
NFS (Network File System) is another file-sharing protocol used for network access to files, also typically associated with NAS, and like CIFS, does not represent a high-performance storage architecture for databases.
Concept tested: Storage Area Network (SAN) performance
Source: https://www.netapp.com/blog/nas-vs-san-what-is-the-difference/
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.