CV0-002 · Question #416
A customer is building a web cluster in which all nodes must access a shared pool of images. Which of the following storage types would be BEST for this workload?
The correct answer is D. Object Storage. For a web cluster where all nodes need shared access to a pool of images, object storage is the optimal choice.
Question
A customer is building a web cluster in which all nodes must access a shared pool of images. Which of the following storage types would be BEST for this workload?
Options
- ABlock storage
- BFile-level access storage
- CDirect attached storage
- DObject Storage
How the community answered
(44 responses)- A9% (4)
- B16% (7)
- C2% (1)
- D73% (32)
Why each option
For a web cluster where all nodes need shared access to a pool of images, object storage is the optimal choice.
Block storage provides raw block-level access typically used for operating systems or databases and is not ideal for direct, shared access of image files across multiple web nodes.
While file-level access storage (like NFS) provides shared access, object storage generally offers superior scalability, cost-efficiency, and simpler web-friendly access for a large pool of static images in a web cluster.
Direct attached storage is local to a single server and cannot be shared across multiple nodes in a distributed web cluster.
Object storage is highly scalable, durable, and cost-effective for storing large quantities of unstructured data like images. It natively supports easy HTTP/S access, making it perfectly suited for web clusters where multiple nodes efficiently retrieve static content without complex file sharing mechanisms.
Concept tested: Storage types for web applications
Source: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/Welcome.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.