CV0-002 · Question #406
A cloud administrator is given a requirement to maintain a copy of all system logs for seven years. All servers are deployed in a public cloud provider's environment. Which of the following is the…
The correct answer is B. Schedule a nightly job on each server to archive all logs. Copy them to a compressed drive on the server. The most cost-efficient way to retain system logs for seven years on public cloud servers is to archive and compress them locally on the server. This avoids additional storage service costs and data transfer fees.
Question
A cloud administrator is given a requirement to maintain a copy of all system logs for seven years. All servers are deployed in a public cloud provider's environment. Which of the following is the MOST cost-efficient solution for retaining these logs?
Options
- ACreate a long-term storage repository at the cloud provider. Have all logs copied to the cloud storage
- BSchedule a nightly job on each server to archive all logs. Copy them to a compressed drive on the server.
- CConfigure SMTP services on each server and schedule a nightly job to email the logs to the cloud
- DConfigure a nightly job on each server to copy all logs to a single server. Schedule a job on the server to
How the community answered
(34 responses)- A6% (2)
- B74% (25)
- C3% (1)
- D18% (6)
Why each option
The most cost-efficient way to retain system logs for seven years on public cloud servers is to archive and compress them locally on the server. This avoids additional storage service costs and data transfer fees.
While a long-term storage repository at the cloud provider is a valid option for retention, it would incur additional costs for the dedicated storage service and potentially data transfer costs to move logs from the servers to this repository, making it less cost-efficient than local storage.
Scheduling a nightly job to archive and compress logs on the server itself is the most cost-efficient solution because it leverages existing server storage without incurring additional costs for separate cloud storage services, data egress, or inter-service data transfer fees. Compression also reduces the storage footprint on the existing disk, further optimizing costs.
Configuring SMTP services to email logs is highly inefficient and expensive for long-term, large-volume log retention due to email size limits, potential security risks, and the operational overhead of managing email for storage.
Copying all logs to a single server before retention creates a single point of failure and adds network transfer costs and storage burden to that one server, which is less efficient and scalable than managing logs locally on each server.
Concept tested: Cost-efficient cloud log retention strategy
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.