CTFL_SYLL_4.0 · Question #76
Which of the following is an advantage of the whole team approach?
The correct answer is A. Any person in the team with the right skills can perform any task. Option A is correct because the whole team approach is an Agile principle where quality is a shared responsibility - any team member with the required skills can step in to perform any task, increasing flexibility and reducing bottlenecks. Why the distractors are wrong: B…
Question
Which of the following is an advantage of the whole team approach?
Options
- AAny person in the team with the right skills can perform any task
- BTasks are assigned to specific team members who will own that task until completion
- CTesters have clear ownership of quality and this eliminates confusion and overlap
- DBusiness representatives are not included in the team so they can supply independent
How the community answered
(28 responses)- A93% (26)
- B4% (1)
- D4% (1)
Explanation
Option A is correct because the whole team approach is an Agile principle where quality is a shared responsibility - any team member with the required skills can step in to perform any task, increasing flexibility and reducing bottlenecks.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- B describes the opposite: fixed task ownership is a siloed, traditional approach that the whole team model explicitly moves away from.
- C contradicts the core idea - in the whole team approach, quality is everyone's responsibility, not solely the testers'. Exclusive tester ownership creates the very confusion and overlap the approach tries to eliminate.
- D is backwards - business representatives are included in the whole team (e.g., as product owners or customer proxies). Excluding them would undermine collaboration.
Memory tip: Think of "whole team" literally - the whole team owns quality, meaning any member can do any task they're skilled for. If an answer suggests exclusion, isolation, or fixed ownership, it's wrong.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.