nerdexam
iSQI

CTFL_SYLL_4.0 · Question #161

For the same financial institution in Question 12, with the same requirements and expectations, what would be the most likely investment values used in testing if two-point boundary value analysis…

The correct answer is A. R100 000, R100 001, R500 000, R500 001. For boundary value analysis, the test cases should include the boundary values just inside and just outside the equivalence partition for the 13% interest rate range: R100,000 (just inside the previous range) R100,001 (start of the 13% range) R500,000 (end of the 13% range)…

Test Analysis and Design

Question

For the same financial institution in Question 12, with the same requirements and expectations, what would be the most likely investment values used in testing if two-point boundary value analysis is used to design test cases specific to the 13% interest rate equivalence partition?

Options

  • AR100 000, R100 001, R500 000, R500 001.
  • BR99 999, R100 000, R499 999, R500 000.
  • CR100 000. R500 000.
  • DR99 000, R500 001.

How the community answered

(27 responses)
  • A
    78% (21)
  • B
    4% (1)
  • C
    7% (2)
  • D
    11% (3)

Explanation

For boundary value analysis, the test cases should include the boundary values just inside and just outside the equivalence partition for the 13% interest rate range: R100,000 (just inside the previous range) R100,001 (start of the 13% range) R500,000 (end of the 13% range) R500,001 (just outside the range) These values ensure that both the edges of the partition are tested.

Topics

#boundary value analysis#two-point BVA#equivalence partitioning#test case design

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Sign up to join the discussion
Full CTFL_SYLL_4.0 Practice