New features have been added for the current release of a SUT. Which action would NOT be appropriate for the TAE to perform when evaluating the impact on the TAS?

The correct answer is A. Gather feedback from the Business Analysts to determine if the current TAS will meet the needs. Gathering feedback from Business Analysts is not typically the responsibility of the Test Automation Engineer (TAE) when evaluating the impact on the TAS. The TAE focuses on the technical aspects such as keyword modification, test execution validation, and tool compatibility…

Verifying the Test Automation Solution

Question

Options

AGather feedback from the Business Analysts to determine if the current TAS will meet the needs
BReview existing keywords to see if they need to be modified.
CRun existing automated tests against the updated SUT to verify and record any changes to their
DEvaluate compatibility with existing test tools and, where necessary, identify alternative solutions.

How the community answered

(41 responses)

A
76% (31)
B
2% (1)
C
15% (6)
D
7% (3)

Explanation

Gathering feedback from Business Analysts is not typically the responsibility of the Test Automation Engineer (TAE) when evaluating the impact on the TAS. The TAE focuses on the technical aspects such as keyword modification, test execution validation, and tool compatibility. Business Analysts are more involved in requirement validation than in assessing automation tool

Topics

#TAS maintenance#impact analysis#SUT changes#keyword review

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full CTAL-TAE Practice