If you are tracking the frequency that a test automation code reports a defect that is not really a defect, what metric are you gathering?

The correct answer is D. The number of false-fail results. Tracking how often the test automation code reports a defect that is not actually present corresponds to measuring the number of false-fail results. This metric helps assess the reliability and accuracy of the automation, reducing time wasted on investigating non-existent issues.

Reporting and Metrics

Question

Options

ATool scripting metrics.
BAutomation code defect density.
CTrend metrics.
DThe number of false-fail results.

How the community answered

(53 responses)

A
2% (1)
B
4% (2)
C
4% (2)
D
91% (48)

Explanation

Tracking how often the test automation code reports a defect that is not actually present corresponds to measuring the number of false-fail results. This metric helps assess the reliability and accuracy of the automation, reducing time wasted on investigating non-existent issues.

Topics

#false-fail results#automation metrics#test reliability#metric types

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full CTAL-TAE Practice