CTAL-TAE · Question #15
The Test Automation Manager has asked you to provide a solution for collecting metrics from the TAS that measures code coverage every time the automated regression test pack is run. The metrics must…
The correct answer is C. The automated testware would record overall code coverage for each run, export the data to a. Automating the collection and reporting of code coverage metrics after each regression test run. It ensures that trend analysis is available with minimal manual effort, helping stakeholders monitor whether test coverage keeps up with system changes and enhancements.
Question
The Test Automation Manager has asked you to provide a solution for collecting metrics from the TAS that measures code coverage every time the automated regression test pack is run. The metrics must be trend based to ensure that the scope of the regression test pack continues to reflect enhancements made to the SUT - coverage must not drop and should ideally increase. The solution must be as automated as possible to avoid unnecessary manual overheads and errors. Which of the following approaches would BEST meet these requirements?
Options
- ATest automation cannot measure code coverage for the SUT, only the code for the automation
- BThe automated testware would record overall code coverage for each run and add the figure to a
- CThe automated testware would record overall code coverage for each run, export the data to a
- DThe automated testware would record the pass/fail rate of each regression test case, export the
How the community answered
(22 responses)- A5% (1)
- B9% (2)
- C64% (14)
- D23% (5)
Explanation
Automating the collection and reporting of code coverage metrics after each regression test run. It ensures that trend analysis is available with minimal manual effort, helping stakeholders monitor whether test coverage keeps up with system changes and enhancements.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.