CS0-003 · Question #532
A security analyst needs to identify services in a small, critical infrastructure ICS network. Many components in the network are likely to break if they receive malformed or unusually large requests.
The correct answer is D. Use Nessus with restricted concurrent connections.. In a sensitive critical infrastructure ICS network where systems are prone to breaking, using a vulnerability scanner like Nessus with restricted concurrent connections is the safest method for service identification.
Question
A security analyst needs to identify services in a small, critical infrastructure ICS network. Many components in the network are likely to break if they receive malformed or unusually large requests. Which of the following is the safest method to use when identifying service versions?
Options
- AUse nmap -sV to identify all assets on the network.
- BUse Burp Suite to conduct service identification.
- CUse nc to manually perform banner grabbing.
- DUse Nessus with restricted concurrent connections.
How the community answered
(30 responses)- A3% (1)
- B10% (3)
- C17% (5)
- D70% (21)
Why each option
In a sensitive critical infrastructure ICS network where systems are prone to breaking, using a vulnerability scanner like Nessus with restricted concurrent connections is the safest method for service identification.
Nmap's `-sV` (service version detection) switch can be aggressive and send malformed probes to elicit responses, potentially disrupting fragile ICS devices, which is unacceptable in critical infrastructure.
Burp Suite is primarily a web application security testing tool and is not typically used for network-wide service identification on an ICS network, and its active scanning capabilities could be disruptive to such systems.
Using `nc` (netcat) for manual banner grabbing involves direct, often unthrottled, interaction with services, which could still trigger unintended behavior or overwhelm a fragile ICS device if not executed with extreme caution and precision.
Nessus, when properly configured to limit concurrent connections and scan intensity, can perform service version identification with less risk to fragile ICS components compared to aggressive scanning techniques, allowing for a more controlled and throttled probing approach.
Concept tested: Safe network scanning for fragile systems
Source: https://www.tenable.com/products/nessus
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.