nerdexam
Isaca

CRISC · Question #391

Which of the following is the BEST course of action for a system administrator who suspects a colleague may be intentionally weakening a system's validation controls in order to pass through fraudulen

The correct answer is B. Share the concern through a whistleblower communication channel.. When a system administrator suspects a colleague of intentionally weakening validation controls for fraudulent transactions, the best course of action is to report the concern through a whistleblower communication channel.

Submitted by suresh_in· Apr 18, 2026Risk Response and Reporting

Question

Which of the following is the BEST course of action for a system administrator who suspects a colleague may be intentionally weakening a system's validation controls in order to pass through fraudulent transactions?

Options

  • AImplement compensating controls to deter fraud attempts.
  • BShare the concern through a whistleblower communication channel.
  • CMonitor the activity to collect evidence.
  • DDetermine whether the system environment has flaws that may motivate fraud attempts.

How the community answered

(37 responses)
  • A
    3% (1)
  • B
    73% (27)
  • C
    8% (3)
  • D
    16% (6)

Why each option

When a system administrator suspects a colleague of intentionally weakening validation controls for fraudulent transactions, the best course of action is to report the concern through a whistleblower communication channel.

AImplement compensating controls to deter fraud attempts.

Implementing compensating controls might deter future fraud but does not address the existing suspected intentional malicious activity by a colleague or the need for investigation.

BShare the concern through a whistleblower communication channel.Correct

Suspecting a colleague of intentional fraud and weakening controls is a serious ethical and legal issue involving an insider threat. Using a whistleblower communication channel is the appropriate first step, as it provides a formal, often anonymous, and protected means to report such grave misconduct to the correct authorities within the organization for investigation, addressing suspected criminal activity responsibly.

CMonitor the activity to collect evidence.

Monitoring activity to collect evidence without proper authorization or policy could lead to legal issues or compromise the investigation.

DDetermine whether the system environment has flaws that may motivate fraud attempts.

While understanding system flaws is important, focusing on environmental flaws distracts from the immediate and serious concern of a colleague intentionally weakening controls for fraud.

Concept tested: Insider threat response and ethical reporting

Topics

#Insider Threat#Fraud Reporting#Whistleblower Policy#Risk Response

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full CRISC Practice