nerdexam
Isaca

CRISC · Question #304

Which strategy employed by risk management would BEST help to prevent internal fraud?

The correct answer is C. Ensure segregation of duties are implemented within key systems or processes. Implementing segregation of duties is the most effective risk management strategy to prevent internal fraud by ensuring no single individual has complete control over a critical process.

Submitted by chen.hong· Apr 18, 2026Risk Response and Reporting

Question

Which strategy employed by risk management would BEST help to prevent internal fraud?

Options

  • ARequire control owners to conduct an annual control certification.
  • BConduct regular internal and external audits on the systems supporting financial reporting.
  • CEnsure segregation of duties are implemented within key systems or processes.
  • DRequire the information security officer to review unresolved incidents.

How the community answered

(18 responses)
  • A
    6% (1)
  • C
    89% (16)
  • D
    6% (1)

Why each option

Implementing segregation of duties is the most effective risk management strategy to prevent internal fraud by ensuring no single individual has complete control over a critical process.

ARequire control owners to conduct an annual control certification.

Annual control certification verifies control effectiveness, which is good practice, but it is a detection and assurance mechanism rather than a direct preventative measure against internal fraud like SoD.

BConduct regular internal and external audits on the systems supporting financial reporting.

Regular audits are detective controls that identify fraud after it has occurred or detect vulnerabilities, but they do not primarily prevent internal fraud in real-time.

CEnsure segregation of duties are implemented within key systems or processes.Correct

Segregation of duties (SoD) prevents a single individual from performing all steps in a critical process that could lead to fraud or error, such as authorizing, executing, and recording transactions. By distributing responsibilities, it creates a check-and-balance system that makes collusion necessary for fraud.

DRequire the information security officer to review unresolved incidents.

Reviewing unresolved incidents is part of incident management and helps identify weaknesses, but it is a reactive measure rather than a proactive prevention strategy against internal fraud.

Concept tested: Preventing internal fraud with Segregation of Duties

Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/compliance/regulatory/auditing-segregation-of-duties-overview

Topics

#Internal Fraud#Segregation of Duties#Risk Mitigation#Preventative Controls

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full CRISC Practice