nerdexam
Isaca

CRISC · Question #298

A company has located its computer center on a moderate earthquake fault. Which of the following is the MOST important consideration when establishing a contingency plan and an alternate processing…

The correct answer is D. The alternative site does not reside on the same fault no matter how far the distance apart. When establishing a contingency plan for a computer center on an earthquake fault, the most important consideration for an alternate processing site is that it does not reside on the same fault line.

Submitted by mateo_ar· Apr 18, 2026Risk Response and Reporting

Question

A company has located its computer center on a moderate earthquake fault. Which of the following is the MOST important consideration when establishing a contingency plan and an alternate processing site?

Options

  • AThe contingency plan provides for backup media to be taken to the alternative site.
  • BThe contingency plan for high priority applications does not involve a shared cold site.
  • CThe alternative site is a hot site with equipment ready to resume processing immediately.
  • DThe alternative site does not reside on the same fault no matter how far the distance apart.

How the community answered

(64 responses)
  • A
    5% (3)
  • B
    8% (5)
  • C
    17% (11)
  • D
    70% (45)

Why each option

When establishing a contingency plan for a computer center on an earthquake fault, the most important consideration for an alternate processing site is that it does not reside on the same fault line.

AThe contingency plan provides for backup media to be taken to the alternative site.

While backup media transfer is crucial, it's a procedural detail, secondary to the critical geographical placement of the alternate site.

BThe contingency plan for high priority applications does not involve a shared cold site.

Using a shared cold site for high-priority applications might be a risk, but the *location* relative to the fault is a more fundamental consideration for disaster resilience.

CThe alternative site is a hot site with equipment ready to resume processing immediately.

A hot site is desirable for rapid recovery, but its effectiveness is nullified if it's located in the same disaster zone as the primary site.

DThe alternative site does not reside on the same fault no matter how far the distance apart.Correct

For a computer center located on an earthquake fault, the primary concern for an alternate processing site is ensuring geographic separation and independence from the same fault line. This mitigates the risk of a single seismic event affecting both the primary and alternate sites simultaneously, thus maintaining disaster recovery capability. The distance is less important than the geological independence.

Concept tested: Disaster Recovery Site Selection

Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/resiliency/business-continuity-dr-guidance

Topics

#Disaster Recovery Planning#Alternate Site Selection#Geographic Separation#Risk Mitigation

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full CRISC Practice