The process of ensuring that hand-applied labels are 100% inspected is to: Response:

Question

Options

• AIncrease packaging time
• BEnsure labeling accuracy
• CCreate more work for inspectors
• DReduce the need for automated systems

• A
  13% (8)
• B
  77% (47)
• C
  7% (4)
• D
  3% (2)

Explanation

100% inspection of hand-applied labels directly ensures labeling accuracy (B) - every unit is checked, catching misapplications, misalignments, or wrong labels before products reach customers. This is a core quality control principle: when automation isn't handling the labeling, manual 100% inspection compensates by verifying each label individually.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A (increase packaging time) - while 100% inspection may slow throughput, that's a side effect, not the purpose of the process.
• C (create more work for inspectors) - again a consequence, not a goal; inspectors exist to catch defects, not to generate workload for its own sake.
• D (reduce need for automated systems) - the opposite is closer to true; thorough manual inspection often highlights where automation would help.

Memory tip: Think of the phrase "hand-applied = human error risk." Whenever humans apply labels, 100% inspection is the countermeasure - its entire purpose is accuracy assurance, not time, workload, or automation decisions.

No community discussion yet for this question.