Your multinational organization has servers running mission-critical workloads on its premises around the world. You want to be able to manage these workloads consistently and centrally, and you…

Question

Options

• AMigrate the workloads to a public cloud
• BMigrate the workloads to a central office building
• CMigrate the workloads to multiple local co-location facilities
• DMigrate the workloads to multiple local private clouds

• A
  88% (30)
• B
  6% (2)
• C
  3% (1)
• D
  3% (1)

Explanation

Migrating to a public cloud enables centralized, consistent management of workloads from anywhere in the world through a single control plane (e.g., Google Cloud Console, APIs, or tools like Terraform). Critically, it eliminates the need to manage physical infrastructure-the cloud provider handles hardware, facilities, and capacity. Option B (central office) still requires managing on-premises hardware and introduces single-point-of-failure risk. Option C (colocation) offloads the facility but the organization still owns and manages the servers. Option D (private clouds) still requires the organization to manage the underlying infrastructure, failing the key requirement of stopping infrastructure management.

No community discussion yet for this question.