CISSP · Question #877
For a victim of a security breach to prevail in a negligence claim, what MUST the victim establish?
The correct answer is C. Proximate cause. To successfully claim negligence after a security breach, a victim must establish proximate cause, demonstrating a direct link between the negligent act and the resulting harm.
Question
For a victim of a security breach to prevail in a negligence claim, what MUST the victim establish?
Options
- AConcern
- BBreach of contract
- CProximate cause
- DHardship
How the community answered
(34 responses)- A6% (2)
- C91% (31)
- D3% (1)
Why each option
To successfully claim negligence after a security breach, a victim must establish proximate cause, demonstrating a direct link between the negligent act and the resulting harm.
Concern is a subjective feeling and does not represent a required legal element for proving negligence or damages in a lawsuit.
Breach of contract is a separate legal claim based on the violation of an agreement's terms, distinct from a tort claim of negligence which focuses on a duty of care.
Proximate cause is a critical legal element in a negligence claim, requiring the victim to prove that the defendant's negligent actions (e.g., poor security practices) were a direct and foreseeable cause of the victim's damages resulting from the security breach. Without establishing this direct causal link, a court cannot legally attribute the harm to the alleged negligence, preventing the victim from prevailing.
While a victim may experience hardship, 'hardship' itself is not a specific legal element that must be established to prove negligence; actual damages must be proven instead.
Concept tested: Proximate cause in negligence claims
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.