CISSP · Question #485
Additional padding may be added to the Encapsulating security protocol (ESP) trailer to provide which of the following?
The correct answer is B. Partial traffic flow confidentiality. ESP trailer padding serves multiple purposes, including alignment, but additional padding beyond what is required for alignment provides partial traffic flow confidentiality by obscuring the true length of the payload.
Question
Additional padding may be added to the Encapsulating security protocol (ESP) trailer to provide which of the following?
Options
- AData origin authentication
- BPartial traffic flow confidentiality
- Cprotection ao>ainst replay attack
- DAccess control
How the community answered
(23 responses)- A4% (1)
- B78% (18)
- C4% (1)
- D13% (3)
Why each option
ESP trailer padding serves multiple purposes, including alignment, but additional padding beyond what is required for alignment provides partial traffic flow confidentiality by obscuring the true length of the payload.
Data origin authentication in ESP is provided through the Authentication Data field (ICV/HMAC) appended after the ESP trailer, not through padding.
In ESP, the Padding field in the trailer can be extended beyond the minimum required for block cipher alignment to obscure the actual length of the plaintext payload. By varying or inflating the payload size with extra padding, an attacker observing encrypted traffic cannot easily determine the true size of the data being transmitted, thus providing partial traffic flow confidentiality. This is defined in RFC 4303, which specifies that additional padding may be added to conceal the actual length of the payload.
Protection against replay attacks in ESP is achieved via the Sequence Number field in the ESP header combined with a sliding window mechanism, not through trailer padding.
Access control is a policy-level function enforced by security policies and security associations (SAs) in the IPsec framework, not by ESP trailer padding.
Concept tested: ESP trailer padding for traffic flow confidentiality
Source: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4303
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.