nerdexam
(ISC)2

CISSP · Question #412

Which is the MOST effective countermeasure to prevent electromagnetic emanations on unshielded data cable?

The correct answer is B. Encase exposed cable runs in metal conduit. Electromagnetic emanations from unshielded cables can be intercepted (TEMPEST attack); encasing cables in metal conduit provides Faraday shielding that contains and attenuates the radiated signals.

Submitted by miguelv· Mar 5, 2026Security Architecture and Engineering

Question

Which is the MOST effective countermeasure to prevent electromagnetic emanations on unshielded data cable?

Options

  • AMove cable are away from exterior facing windows
  • BEncase exposed cable runs in metal conduit
  • CEnable Power over Ethernet (PoE) to increase voltage
  • DBundle exposed cables together to disguise their signals

How the community answered

(68 responses)
  • A
    1% (1)
  • B
    94% (64)
  • C
    1% (1)
  • D
    3% (2)

Why each option

Electromagnetic emanations from unshielded cables can be intercepted (TEMPEST attack); encasing cables in metal conduit provides Faraday shielding that contains and attenuates the radiated signals.

AMove cable are away from exterior facing windows

Moving cables away from exterior windows reduces the proximity of an outside attacker but does not eliminate the electromagnetic emanation itself, leaving signals still interceptable from interior locations or with sensitive equipment.

BEncase exposed cable runs in metal conduitCorrect

Metal conduit acts as a Faraday cage, absorbing and grounding electromagnetic emanations before they can radiate beyond the cable run. This is a recognized TEMPEST countermeasure that physically contains RF signals, preventing interception by adversaries using spectrum analysis or van Eck phreaking techniques. It directly addresses the source of the vulnerability rather than relying on distance or obfuscation.

CEnable Power over Ethernet (PoE) to increase voltage

Power over Ethernet increases electrical power delivered for device operation and has no relationship to reducing or shielding electromagnetic emanations from data signals on the cable.

DBundle exposed cables together to disguise their signals

Bundling cables together does not suppress or shield individual cable emissions; signals from multiple cables can still be captured and separated by an attacker using signal analysis, and bundling may actually increase cross-talk without reducing overall radiation.

Concept tested: TEMPEST shielding and electromagnetic emanation countermeasures

Source: https://www.nsa.gov/Portals/75/documents/what-we-do/cybersecurity/professional-resources/csi-tempest-a-signal-problem.pdf

Topics

#TEMPEST#electromagnetic emanations#physical security

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full CISSP Practice