CISSP · Question #1348
A small office is running WiFi 4 APs, and neighboring offices do not want to increase the throughput to associated devices. Which of the following is the MOST cost-efficient way for the office to incr
The correct answer is D. Upgrade to WiFi 5.. The question asks for the most cost-efficient way to increase network performance in a small office running WiFi 4 APs, given that neighboring offices do not want interference or throughput increases affecting them.
Question
Options
- AAdd another AP.
- BDisable the 2.4GHz radios
- CEnable channel bonding.
- DUpgrade to WiFi 5.
How the community answered
(44 responses)- A2% (1)
- B16% (7)
- C7% (3)
- D75% (33)
Why each option
The question asks for the most cost-efficient way to increase network performance in a small office running WiFi 4 APs, given that neighboring offices do not want interference or throughput increases affecting them.
Adding another AP increases costs for hardware and management and may cause co-channel interference in a small office environment, making it less cost-efficient than a standards upgrade.
Disabling 2.4GHz radios would reduce coverage and eliminate backward compatibility with older 2.4GHz-only client devices, potentially degrading rather than improving overall network performance.
Enabling channel bonding on WiFi 4 in the 2.4GHz band would consume more of the limited spectrum, causing interference with neighboring offices-which the question states the neighbors do not want.
Upgrading to WiFi 5 (802.11ac) provides significantly higher throughput, operates on the 5GHz band with more available channels, and supports features like MU-MIMO and wider channel widths. This is the most cost-efficient upgrade path because it directly replaces aging WiFi 4 (802.11n) infrastructure with modern standards that deliver better performance without requiring multiple additional APs or causing interference to neighbors.
Concept tested: WiFi standards upgrade for network performance improvement
Source: https://www.comptia.org/certifications/network-plus
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.