CISSP · Question #1065
In which of the following scenarios is locking server cabinets and limiting access to keys preferable to locking the server room to prevent unauthorized access?
The correct answer is D. Server cabinets share workspace with multiple projects.. In this scenario, server cabinets are located in a shared workspace where multiple teams or projects are working. Locking individual server cabinets and limiting access to keys is a better Access Control: If the server room itself is locked, it may prevent legitimate users (e.g.,
Question
Options
- AServer cabinets are located in an unshared workspace.
- BServer cabinets are located in an isolated server farm.
- CServer hardware is located in a remote area.
- DServer cabinets share workspace with multiple projects.
How the community answered
(35 responses)- A3% (1)
- B9% (3)
- C14% (5)
- D74% (26)
Explanation
In this scenario, server cabinets are located in a shared workspace where multiple teams or projects are working. Locking individual server cabinets and limiting access to keys is a better Access Control: If the server room itself is locked, it may prevent legitimate users (e.g., developers, administrators) from accessing their specific servers. But, by locking only the cabinets and limiting access to the keys, you allow different users to access their respective hardware without granting them entry to the entire server room. Separation of Access: This method allows for more granular control of who has access to what, which is important in environments where different groups or projects are using the same physical space but need to maintain separate access to their equipment.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.