CISM · Question #57
What should be the PRIMARY objective of an information classification scheme?
The correct answer is D. To implement controls proportionate to risk. The primary objective of an information classification scheme is to implement security controls that are proportionate to the risk associated with the data's sensitivity and value.
Question
What should be the PRIMARY objective of an information classification scheme?
Options
- ATo define data retention requirements
- BTo develop an asset inventory
- CTo meet legislative and regulatory requirements
- DTo implement controls proportionate to risk
How the community answered
(35 responses)- A3% (1)
- C3% (1)
- D94% (33)
Why each option
The primary objective of an information classification scheme is to implement security controls that are proportionate to the risk associated with the data's sensitivity and value.
While classification can inform data retention, defining retention requirements is a secondary outcome and not the primary objective of classification itself.
An asset inventory lists assets, but classification specifically focuses on the *information* within those assets to determine its protection needs, not just inventorying.
Meeting legislative and regulatory requirements is a goal that classification helps achieve, but the direct *mechanism* is enabling proportionate control implementation.
The primary objective of an information classification scheme is to implement controls proportionate to risk by categorizing information based on its sensitivity, value, and criticality. This classification allows organizations to apply appropriate security measures, such as access controls, encryption, and handling procedures, ensuring that the most valuable and sensitive data receives the highest level of protection without over-securing less critical information.
Concept tested: Information classification objectives
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/compliance/data-classification-overview
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.