CGRC · Question #373
With respect to legacy systems, What RMF Steps can be applied to validate the security categorization to ensure appropriate security controls have been selected and implemented. Response:
The correct answer is A. Steps 1 through 3 (may be considered to be a gap analysis to determine if necessary and. For legacy systems, RMF Steps 1-3, which involve categorization, selection, and implementation, can be re-applied as a gap analysis to validate security categorization and the adequacy of implemented controls.
Question
With respect to legacy systems, What RMF Steps can be applied to validate the security categorization to ensure appropriate security controls have been selected and implemented. Response:
Options
- ASteps 1 through 3 (may be considered to be a gap analysis to determine if necessary and
- BSteps 4 through 6 (may be considered to be a gap analysis to determine if necessary and
- CSteps 4 through 6 (may be considered to be an impact analysis to determine if necessary and
- DSteps 1 through 3 (may be considered to be an impact analysis to determine if necessary and
How the community answered
(29 responses)- A76% (22)
- B7% (2)
- C14% (4)
- D3% (1)
Why each option
For legacy systems, RMF Steps 1-3, which involve categorization, selection, and implementation, can be re-applied as a gap analysis to validate security categorization and the adequacy of implemented controls.
When dealing with legacy systems, reapplying RMF Steps 1 (Categorize), 2 (Select), and 3 (Implement) is effectively conducting a gap analysis. This process helps determine if the existing security categorization is still valid and if the appropriate security controls have been adequately selected and implemented for the current operational environment.
RMF Steps 4-6 (Assess, Authorize, Monitor) occur after controls are selected and implemented; they are for evaluating and continuously managing the security posture, not for validating initial categorization or control selection.
Steps 4-6 are related to assessment and authorization, not primarily for validating categorization or control selection, and the primary analysis for existing controls in these initial steps would be a gap analysis, not an impact analysis.
While Steps 1-3 are correct, describing this re-application for validating selected and implemented controls as primarily an "impact analysis" is less precise than a "gap analysis," which specifically identifies discrepancies between required and existing controls.
Concept tested: RMF steps for legacy systems, gap analysis
Source: https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/37/r2/final
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.