Significant changes to a system may trigger an event-driven authorization action which may include by are not limited to all of the following except one. Choose the exception. Response:

Modifications to system ports, protocols, and services directly impact the system's attack surface and functionality, requiring potential re-authorization as an event-driven action.

Installation of new or upgraded software components introduces new code and configurations that can significantly alter the system's security posture, necessitating re-evaluation and event-driven authorization.

Changes in how information, including PII, is processed can have major privacy and security implications, triggering an event-driven authorization review.

Changes in the types of information processed, stored, or transmitted by the system directly affect its data classification and protection requirements, necessitating event-driven authorization actions.

Modifications to security and privacy controls fundamentally change the system's defense mechanisms and compliance, requiring an event-driven authorization review.

Moving to a new facility is a physical change, whereas event-driven authorization actions primarily respond to changes in the system's technical configuration, data handling, or security posture that directly impact its risk profile or compliance. While a move might necessitate a new authorization, it's not categorized as an 'event-driven authorization action' in the same vein as direct system modifications.