CERTIFIED-IN-CYBERSECURITY · Question #539
CERTIFIED-IN-CYBERSECURITY Question #539: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation
The correct answer is D: Gas-based. Gas-based fire suppression systems are better for electronics but can be toxic to humans. These systems use gases such as Inergen, FM-200, or Novec 1230, which are designed to suppress fires without damaging electronic equipment. However, these gases can be harmful or even lethal
Question
Which type of fire suppression system is better for electronics but can be toxic to humans? ()
Options
- ADry chemical based
- BWater-based
- CFoam-based
- DGas-based
Explanation
Gas-based fire suppression systems are better for electronics but can be toxic to humans. These systems use gases such as Inergen, FM-200, or Novec 1230, which are designed to suppress fires without damaging electronic equipment. However, these gases can be harmful or even lethal to humans when present in high concentrations. In a data center, for example, a gas- based fire suppression system could quickly extinguish a fire without damaging the servers, but personnel would have to evacuate the area immediately to avoid exposure to the gas. The other options are typically only used in environments with a limited amount of electronic equipment. Water-based fire suppression systems can cause significant damage to electronics and are not suitable for data centers or similar environments. Foam-based and dry chemical fire suppression systems can also damage electronic equipment and leave a residue that is difficult to clean. In addition, while these systems are less harmful to humans than gas-based systems, they can still cause irritation or injury if a person is exposed to them
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.