A financial services company is deploying a Kubernetes cluster to manage highly ephemeral workloads that scale up and down rapidly based on demand. The security team needs a solution that provides…

Question

Options

• AFalcon Cloud Workload Protection (CWP) Sensor for Kubernetes
• BFalcon LogScale for Log Analytics
• CFalcon Sensor for Workstations
• DFalcon Sensor for Windows Servers

• A
  78% (32)
• B
  7% (3)
• C
  12% (5)
• D
  2% (1)

Explanation

Option A: This is the correct choice because Falcon CWP is specifically designed for Kubernetes environments, providing visibility into containers, real-time threat detection, and runtime protection. It integrates seamlessly with Kubernetes without impacting ephemeral workloads. Option B: Falcon LogScale is focused on centralized logging and event analysis. While it helps with incident investigation, it does not provide active runtime protection for Kubernetes workloads. Option C: This sensor is designed for endpoint security on user devices like laptops and desktops. It does not support Kubernetes-specific security needs such as container introspection and runtime threat detection. Option D: While the Windows server sensor is useful for traditional on-prem and cloud-hosted VMs, it is not optimized for containerized workloads in Kubernetes. It lacks deep container visibility and runtime protection features specific to Kubernetes.

No community discussion yet for this question.