An organization wants to use CrowdStrike Falcon to identify running workloads in their cloud environment without deploying a Falcon sensor. Which of the following tools or techniques can accomplish…

Question

Options

• AFalcon Spotlight Vulnerability Management
• BFalcon Horizon (CSPM)
• CFalcon Prevent Next-Gen Antivirus
• DManual process using cloud provider dashboards

• B
  90% (26)
• C
  3% (1)
• D
  7% (2)

Explanation

Option A: Falcon Spotlight focuses on identifying vulnerabilities in systems where a Falcon sensor is deployed. It cannot independently identify running workloads in a cloud environment without sensors. Option B: Falcon Horizon (CrowdStrike's Cloud Security Posture Management tool) is specifically designed to provide visibility into cloud environments, including identifying running workloads, exposed services, and configurations. It achieves this without requiring a Falcon sensor, as it integrates directly with the APIs of cloud service providers such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform to collect data on workloads and resources. Option C: Falcon Prevent requires the deployment of a Falcon sensor on workloads to provide protection and visibility. It is not suitable for identifying running workloads without sensor Option D: While cloud provider dashboards can be used to manually view running workloads, this approach lacks the automation, centralization, and advanced analytics provided by Falcon Horizon. It is a time-intensive and error-prone process compared to using CSPM tools.

No community discussion yet for this question.