An organization is running Kubernetes clusters across AWS EKS, Azure AKS, and Google GKE. They require a single solution that provides runtime protection across all cloud environments while ensuring…

Question

Options

• AFalcon Container Sensor, as it provides lightweight, Kubernetes-native security and multi-cloud
• BFalcon for Databases, since containerized applications often interact with databases.
• CFalcon Sensor for IoT, because Kubernetes workloads require efficient resource management.
• DFalcon Linux Sensor, installed manually on each cloud-hosted Kubernetes node.

• A
  71% (17)
• B
  17% (4)
• C
  4% (1)
• D
  8% (2)

Explanation

Option A: The Falcon Container Sensor is specifically designed for Kubernetes-native runtime protection and is compatible across multi-cloud environments (AWS EKS, Azure AKS, GCP Option B: Falcon for Databases is not intended for container security; it is designed for securing databases, not Kubernetes environments. Option C: Falcon Sensor for IoT is for Internet of Things (IoT) devices, not Kubernetes workloads. Option D: The Falcon Linux Sensor is not optimized for Kubernetes workloads, as it is designed for traditional Linux servers rather than containerized applications.

No community discussion yet for this question.