nerdexam
CrowdStrike

CCCS-203B · Question #162

Your company operates a hybrid cloud environment spanning AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. The security team wants to implement a pre-runtime protection strategy to prevent containerized applications fro

The correct answer is C. Registry Scanning. Option A: Network-based intrusion detection systems (NIDS) monitor network traffic for malicious activity but do not assess container images for vulnerabilities before deployment. They are useful for runtime threat detection, not pre-runtime protection. Option B: Sandboxing isola

Container Image Security

Question

Your company operates a hybrid cloud environment spanning AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. The security team wants to implement a pre-runtime protection strategy to prevent containerized applications from running vulnerable or malicious images. The organization requires a solution that integrates seamlessly across cloud providers while enforcing strict security policies before deployment. Which image assessment method would be the most appropriate for this use case?

Options

  • ANetwork-Based Intrusion Detection
  • BApplication Sandboxing
  • CRegistry Scanning
  • DHost-Based Malware Scanning

How the community answered

(17 responses)
  • A
    12% (2)
  • C
    82% (14)
  • D
    6% (1)

Explanation

Option A: Network-based intrusion detection systems (NIDS) monitor network traffic for malicious activity but do not assess container images for vulnerabilities before deployment. They are useful for runtime threat detection, not pre-runtime protection. Option B: Sandboxing isolates applications to observe their behavior and detect potential threats. However, this method is typically used for testing unknown executables rather than scanning container images in a registry before deployment. It does not provide proactive pre-runtime Option C: Registry scanning is the most effective method for assessing container images before they are deployed. It integrates with container registries (e.g., Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry) to scan images for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and malware before they are pulled into a runtime environment. This pre-runtime approach ensures security compliance across multiple cloud platforms. Option D: Host-based scanning is focused on identifying threats already present on a running system. While useful for runtime protection, it does not prevent vulnerable images from being deployed in the first place, making it an inadequate choice for pre-runtime security.

Topics

#Registry Scanning#Pre-runtime Protection#Multi-cloud#Container Security

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full CCCS-203B Practice