CAS-005 · Question #121
A company wants to prevent a partner company from denying agreement to a transaction. Which of the following is the best solution for the company?
The correct answer is D. Digital signatures. Digital signatures provide non-repudiation, ensuring that the sender cannot deny signing a transaction. This mechanism ties the transaction to the entity through cryptographic assurance. Federation involves identity management and authentication but does not address non…
Question
A company wants to prevent a partner company from denying agreement to a transaction. Which of the following is the best solution for the company?
Options
- AFederation
- BKey escrow
- CSalting hashes
- DDigital signatures
How the community answered
(58 responses)- A2% (1)
- B7% (4)
- C3% (2)
- D88% (51)
Explanation
Digital signatures provide non-repudiation, ensuring that the sender cannot deny signing a transaction. This mechanism ties the transaction to the entity through cryptographic assurance. Federation involves identity management and authentication but does not address non- repudiation. Key escrow is used for securely storing encryption keys and is unrelated to transaction agreements. Salting hashes enhances password security but does not support transactional non-repudiation.
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.