Within an organization, there is a known lack of governance for solution designs. As a result there are inconsistencies and varying levels of quality for the artifacts that are produced. Which of…

Question

Options

• AEnsure that those producing solution artifacts are reminded at the next team meeting that
• BIntroduce a peer review process that is mandatory before a document can be officially
• CIntroduce a peer review and presentation process that includes a review board with
• DEnsure that appropriate representation from each relevant discipline approves of the solution

• A
  3% (1)
• B
  9% (3)
• C
  84% (27)
• D
  3% (1)

Explanation

The root cause is a lack of governance - no standardized review process or authority to enforce quality. Option C introduces both a structured peer review process and a review board, which provides the necessary governance layer: mandatory checkpoints, cross-functional oversight, and authoritative approval before artifacts are finalized. This directly addresses inconsistency by ensuring all designs pass through the same quality gate. Option B (peer review alone) lacks the authority of a formal board. Option D (approval from relevant disciplines) is closer but may not include the structured presentation and review process needed to enforce standards consistently. A reminder at a team meeting (Option A) has no enforcement power.

No community discussion yet for this question.