CAS-002 · Question #347
During a recent audit of servers, a company discovered that a network administrator, who required remote access, had deployed an unauthorized remote access application that communicated over common…
The correct answer is C. Implement SSL VPN with SAML standards for federation. Replacing an unauthorized remote access tool with a properly governed SSL VPN using SAML federation provides secure, centrally managed, and auditable remote access.
Question
During a recent audit of servers, a company discovered that a network administrator, who required remote access, had deployed an unauthorized remote access application that communicated over common ports already allowed through the firewall. A network scan showed that this remote access application had already been installed on one third of the servers in the company. Which of the following is the MOST appropriate action that the company should take to provide a more appropriate solution?
Options
- AImplement an IPS to block the application on the network
- BImplement the remote application out to the rest of the servers
- CImplement SSL VPN with SAML standards for federation
- DImplement an ACL on the firewall with NAT for remote access
How the community answered
(24 responses)- A4% (1)
- B13% (3)
- C79% (19)
- D4% (1)
Why each option
Replacing an unauthorized remote access tool with a properly governed SSL VPN using SAML federation provides secure, centrally managed, and auditable remote access.
Blocking the application via IPS removes the unauthorized tool but does not provide the network administrator with a legitimate, secure replacement for remote access.
Deploying an unauthorized application to the remaining servers compounds the policy violation and increases attack surface rather than resolving the governance problem.
An SSL VPN with SAML-based federation establishes a formally approved remote access solution that leverages federated identity for strong authentication and single sign-on, replacing the shadow-IT application with one that is centrally controlled and auditable. SAML federation ties remote access to the corporate identity provider, enabling enforcement of MFA and access policies across all servers. This addresses the root cause - lack of an authorized, standardized remote access mechanism - rather than merely blocking the symptom.
Adding ACLs with NAT provides coarse network-level access control but lacks the identity federation, strong authentication, and session encryption that a proper enterprise remote access solution requires.
Concept tested: SSL VPN with SAML federation for enterprise remote access
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/manage-apps/what-is-single-sign-on
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.