CAS-002 · Question #164
The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) has decided that servers in the company datacenter should be virtualized to conserve physical space. The risk assurance officer is concerned that the project team…
The correct answer is C. A weakly protected guest OS combined with a host OS exploit increases the chance of a. Co-mingling VMs with different security levels raises VM escape risk when a weakly protected guest OS is combined with a host OS vulnerability, enabling an attacker to break out of the hypervisor boundary.
Question
The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) has decided that servers in the company datacenter should be virtualized to conserve physical space. The risk assurance officer is concerned that the project team in charge of virtualizing servers plans to co-mingle many guest operating systems with different security requirements to speed up the rollout and reduce the number of host operating systems or hypervisors required. Which of the following BEST describes the risk assurance officer's concerns?
Options
- ACo-mingling guest operating system with different security requirements allows guest OS
- BCo-mingling of guest operating systems with different security requirements increases the
- CA weakly protected guest OS combined with a host OS exploit increases the chance of a
- DA weakly protected host OS will allow the hypervisor to become corrupted resulting in data
How the community answered
(29 responses)- A14% (4)
- B24% (7)
- C55% (16)
- D7% (2)
Why each option
Co-mingling VMs with different security levels raises VM escape risk when a weakly protected guest OS is combined with a host OS vulnerability, enabling an attacker to break out of the hypervisor boundary.
While guest OS co-mingling introduces cross-VM risks, this choice does not precisely capture the critical threat of hypervisor compromise resulting from chaining a weak guest exploit with a host OS vulnerability.
Increased attack surface is a valid general concern but does not specifically describe the VM escape scenario that most directly concerns the risk assurance officer.
When a low-security guest OS is compromised and the attacker also exploits a host OS or hypervisor vulnerability, the combined weakness can enable a VM escape that gives the attacker control over the hypervisor and potentially all other guest instances. This compounded risk is the core reason why mixing high-security and low-security workloads on the same hypervisor without segmentation is dangerous.
A weakly protected host OS is a concern, but the scenario specifically involves a weakly protected guest OS enabling a pathway to host OS exploitation - the risk originates from guest-level weakness, not solely from the host OS.
Concept tested: VM escape risk from mixed-security virtual machine co-mingling
Source: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-125.pdf
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.