The manager of the firewall team is getting complaints from various IT teams that firewall changes are causing issues. Which of the following should the manager recommend to BEST address these issues?

A weekly review meeting with all relevant IT teams creates a structured, proactive forum where upcoming firewall changes are communicated before implementation, giving affected teams time to raise concerns and coordinate accordingly. This directly addresses the root cause - teams are being surprised by changes - by ensuring broad visibility prior to any changes being pushed. This aligns with ITIL change management principles that require stakeholder notification and impact assessment before executing changes.

Updating the change request form improves documentation from requesting teams but does not ensure that other impacted teams are notified of or can respond to upcoming changes.

A secondary firewall administrator review is an internal peer-review control that improves technical accuracy but does nothing to inform or coordinate with the broader IT teams who are experiencing the disruptions.

Verifying the change only with the requesting team confirms that team's requirements are met but leaves all other affected teams without advance warning of changes that may impact their services.