Within an organization, there is a known lack of governance for solution designs. As a result there are inconsistencies and varying levels of quality for the artifacts that are produced. Which of…

Question

Options

• AEnsure that those producing solution artifacts are reminded at the next team meeting that quality is
• BIntroduce a peer review process that is mandatory before a document can be officially made final.
• CIntroduce a peer review and presentation process that includes a review board with representation from
• DEnsure that appropriate representation from each relevant discipline approves of the solution documents

• A
  6% (2)
• B
  3% (1)
• C
  79% (27)
• D
  12% (4)

Explanation

The problem is lack of governance - no formal process, inconsistency, and varying quality. Option C is best because it introduces a structured peer review AND a formal presentation process before a cross-functional review board. This directly addresses governance by creating a repeatable, accountable process with representation from all relevant disciplines, which catches domain-specific issues and raises overall quality. Option A (reminding people at a meeting) is informal and unenforceable - it does not create governance. Option B improves over A by mandating peer review, but without a formal review board, it lacks the cross-disciplinary oversight needed to catch all quality and consistency issues. Option D (approval from relevant disciplines) is close but focuses only on final approval rather than building in a review and presentation process, which is less effective at catching problems early and improving quality throughout the design process.

No community discussion yet for this question.