nerdexam
ACAMS

CAMS · Question #244

An institution receives a request for credit from a local company that has been a client for many years. The information provided by the company indicates that its assets have increased…

The correct answer is D. Yes, the shell companies could have been created to hide beneficial ownership. Shell companies are business entities that exist only on paper, with no physical presence, no employees, and no operations. They are often used for legitimate purposes, such as facilitating mergers and acquisitions, protecting assets, or managing investments. However, they are…

Risks and Methods of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing

Question

An institution receives a request for credit from a local company that has been a client for many years. The information provided by the company indicates that its assets have increased substantially with the addition of several new subsidiaries. Further research performed by the institution indicates the new subsidiaries are recently created shell companies. Could this indicate potential money laundering?

Options

  • ANo, the company has been a client for many years.
  • BYes, shell companies are typically created to manage tax liabilities.
  • CNo, it is normal for a business to diversify by creating shell companies.
  • DYes, the shell companies could have been created to hide beneficial ownership.

How the community answered

(47 responses)
  • A
    4% (2)
  • B
    13% (6)
  • C
    6% (3)
  • D
    77% (36)

Explanation

Shell companies are business entities that exist only on paper, with no physical presence, no employees, and no operations. They are often used for legitimate purposes, such as facilitating mergers and acquisitions, protecting assets, or managing investments. However, they are also frequently exploited for illegal activities, such as tax evasion and money laundering, due to their ability to obscure ownership and financial transactions. Money launderers can use shell companies to disguise the origin of illicit funds, evade sanctions, and avoid the anti-money laundering (AML) measures that financial institutions use to detect suspicious activity2. The process typically involves setting up a shell company in a jurisdiction known for strict privacy laws, such as a tax haven, and then using it to move and hide illicit funds while hiding the identity of the ultimate beneficiaries1. In this scenario, the fact that the company has been a client for many years does not rule out the possibility of money laundering. The company could have changed its ownership, activities, or risk profile over time, or it could have been involved in money laundering all along without being detected. The fact that the company has added several new subsidiaries that are recently created shell companies is a red flag that indicates potential money laundering. The company could be using the shell companies to hide the source and destination of its funds, or to conceal the identity of its beneficial owners. The institution should perform enhanced due diligence on the company and its subsidiaries, and report any suspicious transactions or activities to the relevant authorities.

Topics

#shell companies#beneficial ownership#layering#credit risk red flags

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full CAMS Practice